On the Complexity of Candidates-Embedded Multiwinner Voting under the Hausdorff Function.
|
AAMAS |
2024 |
0 |
How Hard Is It to Impact the Impact of Your Paper?
|
IJCAI |
2024 |
0 |
On the Complexity of the Two-Stage Majority Rule.
|
AAMAS |
2023 |
0 |
Parameterized complexity of multiwinner determination: more effort towards fixed-parameter tractability.
|
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems |
2023 |
0 |
On the Complexity of Controlling Amendment and Successive Winners.
|
AAMAS |
2022 |
1 |
On the Complexity of Calculating Approval-Based Winners in Candidates-Embedded Metrics.
|
IJCAI |
2022 |
0 |
Towards completing the puzzle: complexity of control by replacing, adding, and deleting candidates or voters.
|
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems |
2021 |
0 |
A Model of Winners Allocation.
|
AAAI |
2021 |
0 |
The Nonmanipulative Vote-Deficits of Voting Rules.
|
ADT |
2021 |
0 |
On the Complexity of Destructive Bribery in Approval-Based Multi-winner Voting.
|
AAMAS |
2020 |
4 |
Microbribery in Group Identification.
|
AAMAS |
2020 |
4 |
On the Complexity of Constructive Control Under Nearly Single-Peaked Preferences.
|
ECAI |
2020 |
6 |
The complexity of bribery and control in group identification.
|
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems |
2020 |
0 |
On the Tree Representations of Dichotomous Preferences.
|
IJCAI |
2019 |
11 |
Complexity of Manipulating and Controlling Approval-Based Multiwinner Voting.
|
IJCAI |
2019 |
10 |
Complexity of Additive Committee Selection with Outliers.
|
AAMAS |
2019 |
2 |
Towards Completing the Puzzle: Solving Open Problems for Control in Elections.
|
AAMAS |
2019 |
6 |
Parameterized Complexity of Committee Elections with Dichotomous and Trichotomous Votes.
|
AAMAS |
2019 |
7 |
Resolution and Domination: An Improved Exact MaxSAT Algorithm.
|
IJCAI |
2019 |
4 |
How Hard Is It to Control a Group?
|
AAMAS |
2019 |
0 |
Parameterized Complexity of Multi-winner Determination: More Effort Towards Fixed-Parameter Tractability.
|
AAMAS |
2018 |
10 |
Complexity of Controlling Nearly Single-Peaked Elections Revisited.
|
AAMAS |
2018 |
2 |
How hard is it to control a group?
|
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems |
2018 |
2 |
Multiwinner Voting with Restricted Admissible Sets: Complexity and Strategyproofness.
|
IJCAI |
2018 |
18 |
The Complexity of Control and Bribery in Majority Judgment.
|
AAMAS |
2017 |
10 |
Anyone But Them: The Complexity Challenge for A Resolute Election Controller.
|
AAMAS |
2017 |
9 |
Complexity of Group Identification with Partial Information.
|
ADT |
2017 |
6 |
On the Complexity of Borda Control in Single-Peaked Elections.
|
AAMAS |
2017 |
11 |
The Complexity of Bribery and Control in Group Identification.
|
AAMAS |
2017 |
24 |
Approval Voting with Intransitive Preferences.
|
AAMAS |
2017 |
3 |
How Hard Is Bribery with Distance Restrictions?
|
ECAI |
2016 |
10 |
How Hard is Bribery in Party Based Elections?
|
AAMAS |
2015 |
6 |
When Does Schwartz Conjecture Hold?
|
IJCAI |
2015 |
8 |
How Hard is Control in Multi-Peaked Elections: A Parameterized Study.
|
AAMAS |
2015 |
15 |
Manipulation with Bounded Single-Peaked Width: A Parameterized Study.
|
AAMAS |
2015 |
19 |
How Credible is the Prediction of a Party-Based Election?
|
AAMAS |
2015 |
0 |
Election Attacks with Few Candidates.
|
ECAI |
2014 |
12 |
Controlling elections with bounded single-peaked width.
|
AAMAS |
2014 |
25 |
The control complexity of r-approval: from the single-peaked case to the general case.
|
AAMAS |
2014 |
0 |
Exact algorithms for weighted and unweighted borda manipulation problems.
|
AAMAS |
2013 |
12 |
Possible Winner Problems on Partial Tournaments: A Parameterized Study.
|
ADT |
2013 |
15 |