Bipolar Abstract Dialectical Frameworks Are Covered by Kleene's Three-valued Logic.
|
IJCAI |
2023 |
0 |
On Conflict-free Labellings - Realizability, Construction and Patterns of Redundancy.
|
KR |
2023 |
0 |
Equivalence in Argumentation Frameworks with a Claim-centric View: Classical Results with Novel Ingredients.
|
JAIR |
2023 |
0 |
Equivalence in Argumentation Frameworks with a Claim-Centric View - Classical Results with Novel Ingredients.
|
AAAI |
2022 |
1 |
An abstract, logical approach to characterizing strong equivalence in non-monotonic knowledge representation formalisms.
|
Artificial Intelligence |
2022 |
3 |
Shedding new light on the foundations of abstract argumentation: Modularization and weak admissibility.
|
Artificial Intelligence |
2022 |
0 |
Limits and Possibilities of Forgetting in Abstract Argumentation.
|
IJCAI |
2022 |
1 |
Comparing Weak Admissibility Semantics to their Dung-style Counterparts (Extended Abstract).
|
IJCAI |
2021 |
0 |
On Cycles, Attackers and Supporters - A Contribution to The Investigation of Dynamics in Abstract Argumentation.
|
IJCAI |
2021 |
1 |
Choices and their Consequences - Explaining Acceptable Sets in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks.
|
KR |
2021 |
4 |
Forgetting an Argument.
|
AAAI |
2020 |
9 |
Comparing Weak Admissibility Semantics to their Dung-style Counterparts - Reduct, Modularization, and Strong Equivalence in Abstract Argumentation.
|
KR |
2020 |
11 |
Revisiting the Foundations of Abstract Argumentation - Semantics Based on Weak Admissibility and Weak Defense.
|
AAAI |
2020 |
27 |
If Nothing Is Accepted - Repairing Argumentation Frameworks.
|
JAIR |
2019 |
21 |
Extension Removal in Abstract Argumentation - An Axiomatic Approach.
|
AAAI |
2019 |
12 |
AGM Meets Abstract Argumentation: Contraction for Dung Frameworks.
|
JELIA |
2019 |
0 |
A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation.
|
Artificial Intelligence |
2019 |
0 |
If Nothing Is Accepted - Repairing Argumentation Frameworks.
|
KR |
2018 |
0 |
A Study of Unrestricted Abstract Argumentation Frameworks.
|
IJCAI |
2017 |
16 |
A General Notion of Equivalence for Abstract Argumentation.
|
IJCAI |
2017 |
14 |
Characterizing Equivalence Notions for Labelling-Based Semantics.
|
KR |
2016 |
10 |
On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: The hidden power of argumentation semantics.
|
Artificial Intelligence |
2016 |
13 |
An Abstract Logical Approach to Characterizing Strong Equivalence in Logic-based Knowledge Representation Formalisms.
|
KR |
2016 |
9 |
AGM Meets Abstract Argumentation: Expansion and Revision for Dung Frameworks.
|
IJCAI |
2015 |
50 |
Compact Argumentation Frameworks.
|
ECAI |
2014 |
30 |
Context-free and Context-sensitive Kernels: Update and Deletion Equivalence in abstract Argumentation.
|
ECAI |
2014 |
27 |
Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks.
|
Artificial Intelligence |
2012 |
62 |
What Does it Take to Enforce an Argument? Minimal Change in abstract Argumentation.
|
ECAI |
2012 |
125 |
State Defaults and Ramifications in the Unifying Action Calculus.
|
KR |
2010 |
17 |